FOR THE BROTHAS: AN INTRODUCTION

It must have been about 20 years ago when I first began thinking about creating a "Cultural Salon" as a reaction to the mundane social circles In Washington D.C. The richness of intellectual and artistic interchange had died, college friends had moved, the internet had not yet become the phenomenon it now is... I romanticised about the Salons of the mid to late 1800's in Paris, London and Berlin and the cultural dynamo of the Harlem Rennaisance. I was fortunate enough to meet a gentleman, an artist who lived and traveled with James Baldwin... Jimmy he affectionately called him, and he spoke often of their small cottage in southern France and of the many Artists, Poets and Luminaries that dropped in to chat and relax. Well, the impressionists, cubists, modernists, etc. all hung out together famously in those days and shared their ideas with one another creating a creative greenhouse in a world that was rapidly changing. I longed to have lived in those times, to have met Cassat, Rodin, Ellington, Fitzgerald, Baker, Balwin, well I did finally meet Baldwin and others purely for the joy of intellection upon the arts. This was in the late 1980's and by the mid 2000's I happened to run into a friend of mine from Hampton University who had been living in New York since he graduated in the early 90s. Well, I was surprised to hear him comment that in all of the wonder that is New York he never met anyone who ever really had anything interesting to say about art, literature, architecture, science, fashion or anything... I was so surprised to hear this since it had also been my experience. Well here I am in 2011 attempting the Virtual Salon...

Friday, March 28, 2014

AN ANALYSIS OF 21ST CENTURY CIVIL RIGHTS STRATEGIES



THE EVOLUTION OF CIVIL RIGHTS IN AMERICA: HOW TO RE-PURPOSE OUR HISTORIC THINK-TANKS



As I walked past iconic images of The Civil Rights Movement of the 1950’s, 1960’s and 1970’s… past images of workers marches from the late 1890’s and early twentieth century I realized that that style of protest was now thoroughly rooted in the past, that it was totally incapable of working in the age of cyberspace…  The summer of 2013 was alive with reminiscences of The Civil Rights Era being the 50th anniversary of The March On Washington.  I sat in the audience of countless luminaries from that era feeling within them an energy and passion that had not dissipated but continued to burn scorching the dimmed conscience of the 21st Century…



Nobody sees the masses marching in protest  in the city streets anymore and their senses are dulled to the chime that once roused Americans to what were then extraordinary events.   21st century Americans are moving faster than the speed of light; they no longer have time or inclination to slow down, to look and listen to the protest in the streets.  We are a nation of telecommuters and commuters, busy, driven, exhausted urbanites who only stop to take an ephemeal break from the monotony of the workplace and to sleep.  We are a nation who does not take time to raise children or to manage their own health. 



The place where 21st Century Americans come together is in cyberspace.  Cyberspace is the landscape in which the great social movements of the 21st Century will take place and unless the old Think-Tanks of the golden age of Civil Rights prepare themselves for combat in this new landscape they will become obsolete.  In their place the engines of popular culture spew out diversions designed to placate their weary minds in the scarce moments of freedom. 



The new Think-Tanks will exist on the internet.  They will reach billions of people 24 hours a day 7 days a week.  The new Think-Tanks will mobilize people, resources, time, energy, money, etc., on multiple platforms from an instantaneous and simultaneous network in the cloud.   If properly organized, the 21st Century could make the battles of Civil Rights much easier to fight in a conceptual, digital landscape that is wide open, waiting to be planted and harvested.



The early failures of social and civil rights movements such as “Occupy Wall Street” can be attributed to the fact that they relied too heavily on civil rights tactics of the past failing to capture an internet audience.  Can you imagine what kind of effect Occupy Wall Street could have had if had at its disposal the pop culture platform of Facebook or Instagram?  There are many successful models that can be adapted as best practices for the implementation of humanitarian causes such as Civil Rights Movement. If we ask ourselves, “what great causes in the past were also popular culture phenomena?” the list would startle us.  The American Revolutionary War and the Gulf War, prohibition and  the WPA, the Jazz Era and the Era of Rock and Roll are but a few.  All of these things had one thing in common; they were grass roots movements that exploded into popular culture movements of national and global stature.  In alignment with the global focus on sustainability, a 21st century pop culture phenomenon in its own right, let us now take time to repurpose our social Think-Tanks retrofitting them for a new mission in cyberspace.  If change and adaptability are truly the life-blood of successful evolution then it is the only way the entity which was once called The Civil Rights Movement can survive…



FIN

Written by Bigdaddy Blues

Administrator: FOR THE BROTHAS: A VIRTUAL, INTELLECTUAL AND CULTURAL SALON on Facebook

REMEMBERING THE FIELDS OF APPOMATTOX






THE FIELDS OF APPOMATTOX


Chimney and cannon smoke burnt the chilly morning air,
As grim-faced soldiers broke the heavy silence of despair,
The gentle landscape counted standing, those yet alive,
Who arose that early morning of April 9, 1865,

The fields of Appomattox twice were glorified,
First by the chastened souls of soldier’s who had died,
And by the blessed surrender of the rebel s guns,
That is how the Civil War was won,

By David Vollin



For more information on Black American Civil War soldiers click here: 
 http://www.nps.gov/apco/black-soldiers.htm  

Wednesday, February 5, 2014

URBAN ETIQUETTE: THE ART OF WALKING IN…



Gentlemen! Gentlemen! Gentlemen!

Is urban living not crazy enough that we cannot take time to afford others the gentlemanly virtue of a graciously accommodated egress?  Remember your manners the next time you step up to an elevator, a door, gate or any means of entry where you are entering and others who are already inside are exiting; always allowing those inside to exit first! 



On account of my assertive nature I  too have sometimes allowed impatience and insensitivity to tempt me with the potential effect of a most perverse obstruction to my better judgment.  But I have nearly always triumphed over barbarity, gathering my manners and pulling back just in time to rescue my imperiled virtue... Now more than ever I observe those who should otherwise be the shining example of gentlemanliness sink to the level of the most depraved vulgarian.  Why just today I was pushed back inside the elevator by an impatient young Gavin charging into the out-coming crowd like a bull in heat!  And anon, this time by what I thought could have been a seasoned gentlemen, I was grazed by a hurried man as he squeezed his way into the interstice between the door jamb and my comfort  zone. 



Let me leave you with more than just the horror of these indelicate urban adventures.  As a rule always allow those who are exiting to do so graciously before attempting to enter.  A gentleman will stand to the side completely so that he is not blocking any portion of the width of the means of egress.  He makes a point of standing well-poised at the side looking calmly ahead as if unencumbered by haste.  A gentleman is not to be expected to open the door for outgoing pedestrian traffic as if he were a doorman and that is why he will patiently stand to the side allowing the crowd to completely filter out before attempting to enter.  A man who insists on holding the door for strangers as if delighting in the idea that he is performing a good deed to be clearly observed by others is a buffoon, that is the work of a doorman and it is vulgar for a gentleman to assume the duties of a doorman or porter or any service staff employed for the purpose of facilitating the public; it is disrespectful to the seasoned art of their craft.   If when entering a building or portal a  gentleman encounters a mature, elderly and distinguished  lady or gentleman as they are exiting he may pull the door open without making it a formal gesture, nodding if he is thanked whereupon he may safely enter. 



Manners are most effective when they are administered with discretion, honor and humility.  And even though we often encounter those who are not possessed of these gentlemanly virtues it is decidedly impolite to make them aware of their vulgarity especially as a condescension.  As a gentleman you have no authority to publicly judge anyone, real judges get paid to do render this task but limit their opinions to the courtroom!  Set an example by being an example.  And always remember these simple rules of entering for they will serve you well.

fin


Written by Bigdaddy Blues

A Gallery Of Related Images:








Tuesday, February 4, 2014

A BALANCING ACT/ENACTMENT OF BLACK HISTORY MONTH…


Frederick Douglass with his second wife (seated) and her sister


THE BALANCING ACT/ENACTMENT OF BLACK HISTORY MONTH…

William Lloyd Garrison, Abolitionist and Philanthropist


A very wise woman who was my boss once said to me, “There are always two sides to every story”.  Ever since that time I have pondered the meaning and application of that truth to nearly a billion circumstances.  Many Afrocentric’s complain, and with a great deal of validity, that the black man’s contribution to civilization has been whitewashed out of the history books igniting a bold and heroic quest to re-write most of world history from a more inclusive perspective.  

Although America has always been a fusion of cultures and ethnicities' somehow the most difficult issues of race have always come down to black and white.  The struggle for civil rights, as we all know has been a fight shared by soldiers in an army of white and black social provocateurs.  If we are going to tell the story with any degree of accuracy we must begin to refocus on the movement as a whole and not isolate its heroes and heroines in effect removing them from their “Raison d’etre”! 

For example, how can you tell the story of Frederick Douglass without including John Brown and Lloyd Garrison and how can you even think about Harriet Tubman or Sojourner Truth without taking into consideration the friendship they shared with Lucretia Coffin Mott.  In the 18th and 19th centuries many black abolitionists were so intimately associated with white abolitionists, philanthropists, suffragists and humanitarians that they created a global network that has been virtually forgotten. 

Let us therefore begin the task of retelling the story of Civil Rights in America as a brilliant shared brotherhood.  Let us remember the movement and not just the shakers!

FIN


Written by: Bigdaddy Blues
Dedicated to: Rochelle Joseph, "the muse"... 

2-4-14

Friday, December 27, 2013

WHY WERE BLACK OFFICERS NOT ENLISTED AT THE BEGINNING OF THE CIVIL WAR?




WHY WERE BLACK OFFICERS NOT ENLISTED AT THE BEGINNING OF THE CIVIL WAR?



Historians have argued for over 150 years about why Black American officers were not immediately enlisted in The American Civil War.  We do have a wealth of well-preserved facts to frame our argument today, some of which are matter of fact and others that remain open to interpretation.  Without question it can be said that history is nothing if not for the grey areas it invariably leaves as theoretical residue between fragments of truth and fact deposited in the wake of progress and the great continuum of time.   We know that before The Emancipation Proclamation officially freed the slaves they were technically the property of their master’s and in a legal sense neither they nor any free Black men living on United States Soil were considered to be United States citizens.   But the lack of U.S. citizenship status or rather the denial of it was a manifestation of a much larger argument preventing enlistment of Black officers into either the Union or Confederate armies and this singular obstruction lay in the concept of divine right, a grey area if you will factual yet open to broad interpretation as a driving force behind the fateful events of its day.  The day, the time, the place and the era, was mid nineteenth century America poised at the brink of a civil war for which the south had openly prepared 10 years in defiance seeking to preserve the socioeconomic and political organism of slavery as a matter of divine right!



The question of divine right had been under fire since the beginning of the European Enlightenment nearly 200 years before the Confederate sedition took shape.   Many wealthy Confederate slave owners, some of which traced their ancestry to European nobility, romanticized themselves as the American Aristocracy affecting airs as of ancient Roman patricians or European nobility.   Ironically, the Europeans whom they courted as allies refused to aid them in their conflict with the north striking a heavy blow to their culturally obsolete notions of absolute oligarchy.  The spurned Confederates faced war with an industrial behemoth in the north who they had no hope of defeating.  By today’s standards they were reduced to a comic “Mini-Me” of the European Aristocracy they aspired to become but in spite of the global chagrin they wore and the lamentation authored by their misguided continental Cinderella complex the Confederates still offered a formidable fight in defense of a way of life that the luminary author, novelist Margaret Mitchell coined as forever, “Gone With The Wind”.   At length the confederates were forced out of pining by the grim reality of their plight beneath the hammer of the Union Army and doubly wounded by the realization that they must now fight against the very men whom they had viciously and perpetually enslaved.  The entire affair was a tough racial pill to swallow.  150 years after the war white and black Americans still have not processed the profound racial message proclaimed by the enslavement of Black men by white men nor have they sufficiently subdued the lingering hostility inspired by the concept of divine right as justification for the notion of white supremacy.   



The Confederate army declared war against the United States to conserve the notion of the divine right of white men to possess absolute control over the fate, including life and death, of Black men.   According to the Americanized theology of divine right, it was believed that Black men were divinely preordained to be slaves.  The philosophy of divine right held sacrosanct the absolute inferiority of Black men to white and could never permit a Black man to take the life of his superior, (a white man), since the power to make life and death decisions was believed to lay solely in the hands of white men.  This philosophy appears to be arcane by today’s standards but only 154 years ago when The American Civil War was igniting it would have been considered to be the status quot.  In 1860 it was unimaginable for a Black man to detain threaten or assault a white man with our without the aid of a weapon under any circumstance.   Enlisting and paying a Black man to fight and kill another white man breached the most protected covenant of divine right and reversed the process of operant conditioning established to render the Black man docile.  In short, after the United States government had fully invested in the enslavement of Black men locking them out of socioeconomic advancement it could not concede any power to a black man that might equal that of a white man having perverted the law to qualify the white male as divinely superior.    In order for Americans to comprehend the historical facts defining the practise of slavery we must be prepared for the reality that it will require us to occupy the ugly racial landscape of the mid nineteenth century.  History forces us to become men we cannot be and do not wish to become.  We must unfortunately attempt to think with the mindset of white men who hated black men and black men who hated white men in order to understand both sides of the mathematical inequality represented by racism and enslavement In America with the result that we are able to transform old hatreds into new bonds of love and brotherhood. 



The slavery question had haunted America for 105 years at the outset of The Civil War.  A second draft of The Declaration of Independence had been drafted on July 3, 1776, the day before America Declared itself free from the tyranny of the English monarchy.  The Framers of the constitution knew full well that justice had not been delivered to Black men on that day and that the final draft had been crafted to bring wealthy southern planters on board with the revolution.  At the time it certainly must have appeared to have been and economic concession to the egalitarian ideals the framers intended to uphold.  It was a calculated risk that eventually the language encoded into the Declaration of Independence would eventually provide the legal argument needed to free the slaves but their grave foresight condemned millions of human beings over the period of 150 years to the cruelty of enslavement.   There was a second reason other than economics that the Emancipation of Black Slaves was delayed and that reason was most certainly to avoid having to answer the question of divine right.  White Americans knew full well, that slavery could not be justified as a matter of divine right; they knew it was an evil and immoral practise but they feared the extent to which its abolition would force them to share the economic wealth of this country.   Releasing millions of freed slaves and then adding them into the American economy should not have been any more of a concern than the waves of European immigrants just before and after The Civil War except for the matter of race.   America determined 85 years earlier in 1776 in The Declaration of Independence that the civil rights of white men were to be protected while those of Black men were to be denied.  It would not be until January 1, 1863 that the Emancipation Proclamation would deliver the death-blow to the first great challenge of the egalitarian ideals of the enlightenment manifested in the Confederate Movement.  One can only imagine the mixture of emotions that met on the battlefield so many years ago.  Confederate soldiers steeped in racism confronted their worst nightmare, a Black man armed and ready to fight for his freedom!  White northerners were challenged to embrace egalitarianism to fight as comrades with shared ideals beside those for whom they fought and would perhaps die to defend.  For the Black soldiers they were challenged to accept the white men they fought with as allies and to comprehend the revolutionary evolution from a slave to a soldier fighting for freedoms they might not live to enjoy!  At the end of the day the reasons why Black soldiers were not initially enlisted or utilised in The American Civil War could not outweigh the reasons why both Union Army enlisted them and the Confederate army employed them not as enlisted soldiers but as servile technicians.  The south did not enlist Black officers and send them to battle, its arcane philosophy of divine right had outlived its cultural usefulness and was put to rest on the bloody fields of the American Civil War.  In the end the north could only save face by living up to its own philosophy of racial equality and freedom which meant it had to discard the racially charged philosophy of divine right.  As the provocateur, the Confederate south accelerated its own inevitable demise but the northern Union Army forever erased the notion of the divine right of white men to enslave and order the destiny of Black men when it enlisted the first truly Black American soldiers in the 54th Massachusetts Regiment…

Looking forward, we now see that while civilized white men and women from the Confederate and Union Fronts were sympathetic to the freedom of slaves from their oppression they still grappled with the issue of racial equality.  While they recognized that slavery was an evil institution and should be abolished they did not equate freeing the slaves with acknowledging them as equals. So the notion that white men were somehow divinely preordained to have been created as superior beings to Black men persisted as a remnant of the tenacious concept of divine right.  This is largely why racism has persisted to this very day.  Freeing the slaves got slavery off of America's conscience but white Americans still did not view Black men as equals in every dimension.  The Reconstruction set the stage for this revolutionary experiment.  For the first time in human history a peoples who had only months before been enslaved and denied every human and civil right common to man were unequivocally included as full-fledged American citizens and employed immediately as government officials and took offices in congress.  If this optimism could have been sustained we would be well rid of many of the racial inequities that plague our nation today.  But the fleetingly brilliant period of The American Reconstruction was ended with a terrible backlash of socio-economic and political repression. Nearly every freedom granted after emancipation and during The Reconstruction Era was reversed! America had been generous in its gifting of freedom but selfishly and greedily took back the lions share of its gift. Today white and black peoples still struggle with what has now been coined a sense of "Entitlement" of whites over blacks.  To make the soup even more complex, in the 150 or so years since The American Civil War the ethnic admixture of America has grown to include many other races who are largely oblivious to the history of racism between blacks and whites.  Black Americans now experience the phenomenon of other ethnic groups adopting the sense of entitlement over them as these groups assimilate the predominant culture of white Americans.

The lesson to be learned from the 54th Massachusetts Regiment of the Union Army and from the history of racism In America is that white and black people can come together in order to move history forward in positive ways but a great deal of thought and planning must be invested into the implementation of far reaching social reforms so that a climate is created which is responsive enough to guide these reforms through their infancy to maturity.  By no means can we discount the immense progress in the healing of race relations that black and white men diligently worked together to realize but every black man who has experienced the realness of racism understands that much more progress is needed and that it must be a combined effort.  Our American history which reveres the millions of men, women and children who died hopelessly under the pathological brutality of slavery demands that these inequities be balanced once and for all so that we can all move forward in brotherhood.  The American Civil War, the period of Reconstruction and the early years of The Civil Rights Movement are but flashes in the continuum of human history.  These social revolutions were driven by a dire human need to realize instantaneous results.  Because these movements absorbed the lives of those involved after they were achieved on paper everyone had to regroup emotionally, physically and intellectually to process what had really happened.  Building up momentum again after it has died to address critical fixes and implement evolutionary modifications  is much harder to achieve.  Many of the racial struggles of the twenty-first century between black and white men, including the presidency of the first Black American president, Barack Obama, can be attributed to the fact that the issue of freedom versus equality has never been effectively resolved and revisited as a continuing theme for the evolution of the American form of democracy.  As it was on the battlefield nearly 150 years ago we are challenged to solve the great issue of our day, that of "Freedom Versus Equality"!


FIN


Written by David Vollin
Admin: FOR THE BROTHAS: AN INTELLECTUAL AND CULTURAL SALON


A GALLERY OF RELATED IMAGES








Sunday, December 22, 2013

LOOKING THROUGH A CRYSTAL BALL AT THE POSSIBILITY OF BISEXUAL MARRIAGE…




"LOOK... LOOK DEEPLY INTO THE CRYSTAL BALL…  NOW, WHAT DO YOU SEE....




A man walks through a heavily curtained doorway entering a small candle lit room.  Before him lay a small round table covered in tapestry with two ancient chairs heavily carved with figures.  Before him stands a Seer, a Clairvoyant dressed in Turkish garb wearing a dark purple felted fez with a singular eye embroidered upon it in spun gold.  The Seer tacitly motions him to sit down and his arm stretches out revealing that his robes are covered with ancient symbols, spells, charms, talismans, all now unknown to men save for a few who have passed down the lore of centuries.  At length the Seer walks to the table and sits down looking into space as if in meditation.  Presently he fixes his gaze upon the large crystal sphere levitating o’er the table; a spinning cloud of mist fills its impenetrable depths.  His hands move slowly toward the sphere causing it to glow an intense blue hue and as his long, bony fingers caress the visage of the orb he begins to speak to the gentleman sitting across from him, saying:

“Look into my crystal ball!… What do you see? Look closely, closely, deep into the depths of the mystical orb. Relax, allow yourself to be shown things which to others have not yet been revealed. You will see many, wonderful things some real, but all bound to the fate of possibility!  Look closely and there amidst the mist is a rising tide of social change.  You see two, no three people standing before a justice of the peace, they are dressed as if they are to be married, all three.  The vision has shifted, now you see four people who all are to be married to one another… three men and one woman… they are happy on their special day… but they show the weariness of care, for they have fought many hard years for this day…  O’ the vision fades… the crystal ball is grown silent now… What do you think of this vision?”



Though everyone does not have their own Seer to help them perceive events of the future we can usually foresee trending dimensions of social change long before they actually take center stage.  Bisexuality has been one of those slowly trending phenomenon that has captured the imagination of Americans as they struggle to explore the remaining issues of the sexual revolution.  But far from being merely a side show of media entertainment there is a growing population of bisexual Americans who are pushing the envelope of civil disobedience in order to attain what they perceive to be their right to be married under the laws of this great country.  Today the nation is embroiled in a battle regarding same sex marriage and for now has had little time to parley with the demands of the bisexual community.  But the floodgates of change will hopefully be generous once they are fully and truly opened and so the bisexual community continues the war charge to fight for their civil rights and freedoms under the law.



Bisexual marriage is a topic that few can admit they have actually devoted much thought to.  For most it remains something that exists on the fringe of reality and there are enough other day to day concerns to occupy their minds relegating the prospect of bisexual marriage to a place where it has remained for as long as we all can remember… the realm of fanciful “what-if’s” the improbable the unimaginable… But today the prospect of bisexual marriage has stepped up to become a real possibility and we will be obliged to help shape its realization in the years to come for it will not go away and it will surely gain momentum until it does achieve its ultimate goal.  So we must now ask ourselves many questions and seek answers as well.  When bisexual couples seek to satisfy their rights to get married what form will the marriage ceremony take?  How will the marriage document, which will now include 3 or more persons, be worded?  How exactly do we pave the way for the inevitability of bisexual marriages?


Bisexual relationships, which more and more people are openly sharing, already defy the concept of monogamy.   Marriages designed to memorialize bisexual relationships that consist of three or more people will push our concept of the nuptial duo into a refreshed and greatly expanded reality, we will have finally entered into the last phase of the sexual revolution.  Or perhaps this will usher in yet another window of human sexuality that has not yet been explored and must be vetted out in years to come…



As it stands, same sex marriage is one of the most significant social evolutions of human history to date.  Why, because it has forced into question the meaning of marriage itself, transforming it from an exclusive to a universal tradition intended to memorialize the legal, ethical and emotional dimensions of love and binding them with an interminable contract.  Bisexual marriage has a formidable battle ahead because the law does not allow more than two people to be married.  The rationale for this arbitrary law must be defeated in a legal battle.  The case is very simple, a legal marriage limited to two people discriminates against American citizens who share a loving bisexual relationship but are denied the privileges of marriage that have been crafted to accommodate only two people. 



Bisexual marriage must overcome its likeness to that inglorious adjective, polygamy.  As we move closer to a true separation between church and state such religiously biased terminology will be removed from the law books completely.  The task of purging religious prejudices from the law has already become one of the paramount concerns of freethinking Americans.  We can no longer operate government with a bible in one hand and a law book in the other, churches must be left alone to dictate morality within the confines of their community but the laws of the land must remain free of such subjective, religious interference so that they can safeguard the rights of American citizens from a position of objectivity.



The species we call homo sapiens, (we humans),  has existed upon this planet for over 100,000 years but only within the past 700 years, have they made consistent, significant strides toward a truly egalitarian society.  The European Enlightenment opened a door that precipitated the demise of the concept of divine right.  The American Civil War heralded in The Human Civil Rights Era.  The Sexual Revolution eroded concepts of heterosexual-male dominated culture, introduced the validity of homosexuality and same sex marriage and will ultimately usher in the institutionalized legality of bisexual marriages of three or more persons.  You do not need to rely upon a crystal ball, you have only to open your eyes to see what possibilities lay before you because the twentieth century is paving the way for bisexual marriage…


FIN




Written by David Vollin




Saturday, December 21, 2013

A DUMBED-DOWN CULTURE DOESN'T KNOW IT’S DUMBED DOWN!




A DUMBED-DOWN CULTURE DOESN'T KNOW IT’S DUMBED DOWN!


Pyrite Mineral Crystals Specimen AKA Fools Gold


Some people have an issue with intelligence, they despise it, distrust it, fear and envy it, love and hate it; alas it is a scary and self-debilitating bonfire of the vanities.   Perhaps it is their upbringing, they were taught that simple is better; perhaps it is their fear of the unknown, perhaps they are just lazy, but for the first time in human history I see a trend where people who are intimidated by intelligence are actually vocal about it!  Now there is definitely something unsettlingly medieval about anyone being openly critical about the fact that anything is too intellectually lofty.  The classy thing to do would be to say nothing and let the big boys discuss their big things, but not anymore it seems.  This trend coincides with the widening gap in education not only among certain socioeconomic groups in America but also on an international level if one begins to compare the level of education between Americans and other countries; Americans are falling behind in education because our culture promotes mediocrity as a universal marketing tool. 

Pyrite Crystals embedded in limestone


Our culture has got so used to everything being dumbed-down for them that it gets down right combative when it encounters media that is produced for consumption by the higher end of the intellectual food chain.  Our media, largely driven by the retail interests of corporate America has cultivated a low-end of the intellectual food chain society consisting of generations of consumers who are invested in the perpetuation of a uniformly mediocre culture.  No wonder the SAT scores of American students are consistently plummeting.  The common American is being programmed to operate within a 5th grade to 8th grade comprehension level, if that which of course leaves no demand for a higher level of competency.  As the cliché goes, we Americans have, “Created A Monster”!

Pyrite Crystal


One of the residual and almost caracurturesque effects of dumbing-down our culture is that eventually people who lack the technical and intellectual expertise to comprehend and manipulate data forget that their comprehension level is dumbed-down.  I have seen people who have no degree or proven competency in a technical area openly challenge professionals and intellectuals in their celebrated field of expertise.  In my assessment this denotes a critical breakdown of the way our culture perceives that value and reliability of education and knowledge.  That is not to say that merely having a degree or certification makes one infallible, nobody is correct all the time.  I however will always bet my last penny on the man with an education when the bet is about something intellectual.  More than ever do I see the saying come more to life that, “The blind are leading the blind”. 

Pyrite embedded in Limestone


Many modern men challenge the dumbed-down theory of capitalism much preferring to exist in the esoteric realm of the academic, intellectual ivory tower but with a healthy dose of street-level realness!  They enjoy the loftiness achieved when the language they speak is elevated to an high, artistic form and not relegated to a 4th grade level “This is how to put the puzzle pieces together children” instruction manual.  It just suits them as a refined and well-educated gentleman to have the ability to set themselves aside as extraordinary men who think on a level where most people want to be but pretend not to care about.  So unlike popular belief, the self-professed intellectual man is not the odd man out, he is at the front of the line, he is the provocateur, the innovator, the intellectual entrepreneur, he mover and shaker, the Avant Garde, he is, “The Bomb”!  But you will never hear anyone who is a member of the mediocrity club admit this; they are muted by virtue of their own lack of insight because a dumbed-down culture doesn't know it’s dumbed-down.

Pyrite Crystal


Written by David Vollin
Administrator: FOR THE BROTHAS INTELLECTUAL AND CULTURAL SALON





A GALLERY OF RELATED IMAGES: