The all-star cast of the recently released film, “Sparkle”
adds new brilliance to the classic 1970’s Black American classic film. The movie is replete with well-executed
metaphors. Everything about the 2012
Sparkle spells, “Excellence”! Whether you are most impressed by the
screenplay, the costume, the set design or of course, the stellar acting, for those
of us who were fortunate enough to have seen the original Sparkle in 1976
starring Irene Cara as Sparkle and Phillip Michael Thomas as Stix it was an unexpected
surprised that this cinematic treasure had not lost its sparkle. One of
the boldest departures from the original film was a refreshing relocation from
New York City to The Motor City, Detroit!
The look and feel of the original movie set in the Harlem
Ghetto and filmed only a few years after the Death of Martin Luther King and
The Civil Rights Movement was appropriate for its day. It mirrored the struggle of Black Americans
living in the inner cities before they had substantially captivated the popular
culture of America as well as having dug its heels into the economic machine
driving the music and entertainment industry. It was a time well before you could count
millionaire record producers at a dime a dozen on the red carpet, the playoffs
or any one of the hundreds of high-end entertainment venues that count so much
in the consciousness of popular American culture. For those of us who grew up in a bustling
American city during the mid-1970’s everything about the original Sparkle
spells a time that has forever passed away…
For this main reason the producers, Salim and Mara Brock Akil were fully
justified in reinventing Sparkle in such an intelligent, beautiful and
inventive way.
The 2012 version is a smart, crisp reenactment of the speakeasies,
nightclubs and entertainment, the religious
and family scene as well as the day to day of Detroit in the late 1950’s and
early 1960’s. Gifted with such immaculate
costume and set design the film effortlessly pulls the viewer into the mind’s
eye of the producer. Like the 1976 Sparkle, the Patron of the
house is glaringly absent but the home landscape is revised to reflect a
peaceful middle class Black American family and neighborhood without the typical
distractions and “borrowed scenery” of the hood. In this setting we can better focus on the characters
and the meticulously developed series of events that help tell this believable
story. The producers did not attempt to
placate us by moving the setting to a gentler world, in this film realness is a
constant hallmark! Sparkles family life is warm but strained by the strictly principled
leadership of the mother played by Whitney Houston. Whitney portrays a deeply penitent woman once
enamored by the tinsel of stardom who tries to guide her daughters’ into
professional and stable careers while providing a solid, loving home firmly
grounded in spirituality. Sisters
struggle with narcotics and a lethal dose of “un amant mortel,” in the 1976
Sparkle bears a striking irony to Whitney’s real life and death. Whitney’s story became the personification of
Sister’s.
The 1976 Sparkle is almost a Shakespearian tragedy, it
captured the spirit of the last days of the Blues and Jazz era then still very
strong in Americas veins and it surfaced during the climax of the soul music,
disco and R&B eras in America. At
that time America was literally obsessed with the realm of Pushers and Junkies,
Pimps and Prostitutes, the hip vibe and hustle of the streets. Hollywood
didn’t have to make it larger than life, because for millions of people living
in the inner cities of America during the 70’s it was life. Overdose, sexual and physical abuse on such a
massive scale was still very new but had rapidly eroded the very foundations of
civilized life; it was a trend everyone knew would ultimately devastate the
black community. Sparkle circa 1976 was
a testament of its time a Darwinian struggle between good and evil.
Sparkle a la 2012 has had the distinct advantage of
hindsight! The new version adds new
songs not seen in the original. The new
screenplay develops new twists and turns while maintaining the sanctity of the
original story. The 2012 Sparkle attempts a more detailed
examination of the vicissitudes of each characters life. It is this faithful and spot on attention to
detail that drives the film successfully to its conclusion. Sister does not die in the new Sparkle,
rather she takes the blame for the murder of her abusive husband and is thus
removed from the conclusion physically because of her imprisonment; her demise
is ultimately her salvation. The sister
who has been on the career path of a doctor is the ironic murderer. One of the things I did find strange is that
she allowed Sister to take the fall for her with little remorse or gratitude. The circumstances surrounding of the murder
of Satin and the way they hastily play out represent perhaps the only real
weakness of this plot. In classical Greek Mythology, the river Styx
delineates the boundary between the world of the living and the dead. True to form, the demise of Satin delineates
the crossing point in the movie allowing the hard work of Stix who had all but
got the group signed by Columbia records to come into fruition.
The movie is loaded with carefully tailored metaphors many
of them religious references but it never reads like a heavy morality
play. The level of religiosity is
carefully balanced with simple common wisdom.
One of the last major metaphors is facilitated by Whitney near the very
end of the movie. Whitney has been
visiting Sister and on her suggestion visits Sparkle moments before her concert
bringing a gorgeous red-lame dress and Sister’s instructions to keep it sexy on
the stage! Only moments earlier Sparkle
had had a nosebleed ruining the blue dress she wore. One could fish for metaphors about the blue
dress as a symbol of the Virgin Mary since Sparkle was a virgin in the
movie. The spilling of blood upon the
blue dress and the arrival of a new sanguine gown might perhaps represent the
blood of salvation through sacrifice, at best though it is but a colorful interpretation.
So I will leave that inference up to the
viewer allowing them to mold their opinions as they may. One
thing is certain, the three sister’s pursuit of stardom through secular music
clashed with their religious upbringing but their intent to bring beauty and
hope to those who heard the message in their craft gilded their ambition. As Sparkle performed in her concert at the
end of the movie her accompaniment was a large choir robed in white and as they
performed
Sparkle is a primarily a story about the lives of a close
knit family of women and women tend to dominate the film but let’s talk about
the important role that men play in this movie.
The 2012 version of Sparkle was kinder to men and more interested in
what motivates them than the original had been.
Although its villain, Sisters Husband Satin, (not the demon but the
fabric satin), played by Mike Epps was the personification of evil his
character was much more developed as a successful black vaudevillian/minstrel,
comedian performing for a white audience but largely rejected by his own
people. His inner struggle with drugs,
vanity and opulence appeared to be a means of coping with the fact that he
considered his occupation to be degrading.
Even the name Satin bears a close resemblance to the demon, Satan
perhaps a bit too obvious but clear.
Satin marries Sister and moves her into his gorgeous 1955 Frank Lloyd
Wright Usonian and Pre-Columbian Styled mansion ironically which was purchased
and completely restored by a man named Norman Silk in 2006. Silk represents a man who pursues wealth
without regard to personal self-esteem or conscience. Omari Hardwick plays the role of Levi,
Sisters first and devoted admirer in the movie.
Levi is developed as a hard-working, honest and romantic man who is the
perfect mate for Sister but not the one to capture her attention in her own
struggle to achieve instant economic stability after returning home from a
ruined marriage. He is a close fusion of
Mars Blackmon and Jamie Overstreet in the Spike Lee classic film, “She’s Gotta
Have It” minus the nerdiness. The prince
of the move is definitely Derk Luke, easily the “Greer Childs” of this movie
because of his savvy with money, but with a conscience. He plays Sparkles beau, Stix and comfortably shares
the prince charming award with Levi, but Stix represents a more pragmatic man
who just happens to be Levi’s cousin, in the movie. Stix demonstrates business as well as love
savvy, he is a restrained and thoughtful character. Stix and Levi are everything Silk is not. Silk seems to have gotten his fortune easy
but Stix and Levi have definitely worked hard to get what little they have and
they, unlike Silk are ambitious if not only because success was never gifted
them with ease. Silk was expertly
played this time with more roundness than the original who was simply too cold,
cool and detached to even give a decent crack at acting. The 2012 Silk adds a spicy personality to his
character. Perhaps one of my favorite
scenes with Silk is when he and the Preacher engage in what can only be
interpreted as a battle between the ideology of good and evil, a devil angel
debacle in which Silk clearly wins leaving the Preacher in a dumbfounded
stupor. The audience becomes silent at
the conclusion of this scene because of its heavy implications. Kudos to the producers for taking time to
develop well-crafted male characters and therefore, overall the male roles are especially
interesting and well acted in Sparkle 2012.
FIN
Written by David Vollin
Thank you for such an awesome review. I will be seeing it as well.
ReplyDeleteJustus
The movie was not what most expected, it was a complete departure from the original both in theme and in execution... the new version is as much a reflection of the current times as the old was when it was released but the 2012 version has the added benefit of hindsight... don't try to compare the two too closely because they are not equals in any respect! Each version should be appreciated separately because they have two very different directors. The original was tragic, a raw documentation of the hurt and passion of the post-riot Black American Community, the 2012 version is a metaphoric and artful interpretation of the original set in a different but no less valid setting. The shift in setting from the Harlem ghetto to a middle class Detroit suburb allowed the director to explore yet another dynamic of Black American life that rarely gets documented although many of us remember it well having grown up within it.
ReplyDelete