History has challenged men at various times to fight for a
social and political cause or sit it out allowing others to take up the torch
of freedom! Take yourself back to the Deep
South during The Civil Rights Era and imagine the precarious threat many of
black Americans faced having to defend their right to exist as free men on one
hand and having to deal with the hatred and ignorance of the clan and its
sophisticated, and oppressive network of white supremacists on the other. It must have been the equivalent of a living
nightmare but one that had by then stretched over hundreds of years. Not one black family would have escaped the
experience of the lynching of a loved one… or the threat of one at literally
any time or place… It was truly a living
hell…
SEGREGATION IN AMERICA |
The goal of oppression is to use a man’s fear of retaliation
in order to render the oppressed impotent and ignorant; docility is the result
of a cultural brain-wash, a Pavlovian crack, an operant conditioning standard
administered by all successful oppressors to the oppressed. Black Americans
living in the rural and urban south during The Civil Rights Era had every
reason to fear they would be victims of focused violence if it became known by
white racists that they were assembling for the purpose of organizing against
racism but they understood that the alternative was even worse… at least some
of them did… At a time when a black man could be hunted down for sport, hung in
a tree, mutilated, violated and left as a warning for others who could blame
anyone of color from shrinking away from the road of civil disobedience? Even white freedom fighters were not immune to
lynching by zealous racists. It was a
dangerous world of uncertain outcomes but clearly a world on the cusp of
political change…
NONVIOLENT CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE, PROTEST, DEMONSTRATION WERE FUNDIMENTAL ELEMENTS OF POLITICAL CHANGE DURING THE CIVIL RIGHTS ERA... |
The twenty-first century is not without its unique
socio-political challenges and they are no less urgent then those faced by black
Americans nearly seventy years ago in the rural south of these United States. Every time a group of oppressed people are
forced to fight for political change they will face certain inherent risks to
themselves. Depending upon how
progressive the region they live in is these risks could be drastically
different but this difference is always directly proportional to the amount of
resistance that has been applied to that region in order to gradually push it
forward. This means that in some
regions, while there may be a significant proportion of the population that is sympathetic
to change, conditions have not improved because the status quo has not been
effectively challenged.
There is a difference between a dam that is sound and a dam
that is about to break… The sound dam
has not met any formidable resistance, it is strong because it has been
designed to be so and can still resist the forces it was designed to resist. The dam that is about to break has been
challenged with a series of small but well-planned forces applied over a period
of time. Each time force is applied it
is stronger and better focused on its task.
The dam expects renewed resistance but braces itself and even fortifies
itself to deal with new assaults but everyone knows that eventually the
external agitating forces will exceed the dam’s ability to resist and then the
dam will break…
THE NIAGRA MOVEMENT IN 1906 WAS THE FIRST SIGNIFICANT CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT AFTER RECONSTRUCTION. IT'S MANIFESTO WAS TO BE THE VERY SOUL OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT OF THE 1960'S |
When men are thirsty and they cannot drink because the
waters are dammed they only have two choices; to die of thirst or to take down
the dam. Every time men are challenged
with this classic dilemma they must galvanize themselves organizing a formidable
opposition to the change they seek in order to experience and enjoy the fruits
of change. They might endure oppression
and let others fight the good fight in other places and hope that eventually
that change may spread to include them.
But sometimes when change is gifted and not fought for the beneficiaries
fail to comprehend the value of that change having marginally subsisted during its
slow transition. Knowing that one can survive
without change and understanding ones duty to take action to effect positive
change and to continually protect the attributes of change are qualities which
are so individually linked to a man’s constitution.
The sense of civic duty, of responsibility for things
outside of one’s self, the instinct that drives men to assume responsible
stewardship of their world, to take up important challenges and follow them
through, all of these human qualities are inherent in every man but for reasons
that literally shape and define the world in which we live these qualities are
not equally manifested in all men. For
some men it is only a matter of maturity that will define the instant of
revelation. For some men who have a
stronger instinct of selfishness, their internally focused activism for self-preservation
will always prevent them from joining the ranks of progressive men. For this reason alone change is never an
instantaneous thing. Because change is
such a forgiving thing men who would not join the front lines of a cause, who
shrunk from activism, who remained silent or even criticized and doubted the
movement for change are free to enjoy its benefits once change has encompassed
them having been fought for and won. The
men who fight for and accomplish change will never be so shallow as to bar any
man from enjoying its bounty. But until
change is won those who fight must recognize friend from foe for as surly as many
great victories have been won through brotherhood, many defeats are owed to
disunity, lack of focus and to the debilitating blow of a bitter betrayal… The landscape is often treacherous though
precious when on the cusp of political change…
ENGRAVING COMMEMORATING THE TRUE BOSTON TEA PARTY OF THE 18TH CENTURY... PRECURSOR TO THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION... |
LUCRETIA COFFIN MOTT WITH OTHER ABOLITIONISTS AND SUFFRAGISTS |
A very thought provoking read.
ReplyDeleteThe Civil Rights Movement didn’t end racism, of course, but it did change the South enough to entice many African-Americans to come back, igniting a reverse migration movement that continues to gain steam. As and end-result, we have seen a glimpse of the political force this represents back in 2008, when record-breaking African-American turnout helped push Florida, North Carolina and Virginia into blue territory. While this trend contines to manifest itself, the African American community needs to take advantage of this surge in this New Age of Enlightenment or Perfection Era if you will, to further advance our cause fr equality in the workplace and in society as a whole!
ReplyDeleteGreg