DJANGO UNCHAINED ANSWERS THE RACE QUESTION THAT RECENT FILM “LINCOLN”
LEFT DANGLING…
An excerpt from my review of Django:
"As
recent film release, “Django Unchanined” opened up before me I experienced all
of the trusted hallmarks of an epic Tarentino film: a 1970’s aesthetic, realness
and depth of field; a hyper graphic depiction of death and dismemberment; an
ironic humorous digression to humanize the villains; a nitty-gritty 1970’s
stlye in your face language; morbidity served up as undeniable humor; the
distinctly rich, soulful flavor of blacksploitation a la carte; astute
attention to detail and an iron-clad plot with surprises galore… But what I did
not expect was an eloquently developed proof that the assumptions of racial
superiority used to justify slavery and racism are utterly bankrupt. As such Django did the job that its
contemporary film, “Lincoln” did not complete!
This begs an argument regarding what exactly is the role of an
historical drama? Is it acceptable to
merely present a dramatisation of the facts as they are, typically, only
loosely known or conjectured or does the director have a larger role to
interpret the facts while telling a story and bring it full circle to the
present? Most importantly is Django an
historic drama at all? I will let the
viewer answer this question but I will interject that unlike Lincoln, the
character Django and his story are not historically verifiable. In my opinion the genre in which I would comfortably
place Django is that of an Historical Fiction."
READ THE FULL REIVIEW AT:
So glad someone (known to me) would pen their review. I'd been reluctant to see the film as I felt (strong emphasis) that it is comical and 'jumped all around' (thematically) and didn't seem formidable. BB, I appreciate your outlook and anticipate forming a new opinion therewith once I see the film on DVD.
ReplyDelete